SNO:F:F-Sino Land Company Limited (EUR)

COMMON STOCK | Real Estate - Development |

Last Closing

USD 0.915

Change

0.00 (0.00)%

Market Cap

USD 8.58B

Volume

2.27K

Analyst Target

N/A
Analyst Rating

Verdict

ducovest Verdict
Created with Highstock 5.0.6

Verdict

About

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
SNO:F
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2025-01-29 )

Largest Industry Peers for Real Estate - Development

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap
SHG:F Sun Hung Kai Properties Limite..

-0.10 (-1.15%)

USD 25.07B
CHZ:F China Resources Land Limited

+0.02 (+0.68%)

USD 20.67B
CHZ0:F CHINA RES.LAND UNS.ADR/10

+0.20 (+0.68%)

USD 20.10B
DWH:F Daiwa House Industry Co.Ltd

+0.20 (+0.65%)

USD 18.78B
CPP:F China Overseas Land & Investme..

-0.02 (-1.28%)

USD 16.62B
1CK:F CK Asset Holdings Limited

N/A

USD 13.87B
18V:F CHINA VANKE CO.LTD H YC 1

+0.01 (+0.71%)

USD 11.47B
HLH:F Hongkong Land Holdings Limited

+0.04 (+0.96%)

USD 9.44B
RLF:F Longfor Group Holdings Limited

-0.03 (-2.16%)

USD 8.11B
3YZ:F CTP N.V. EO 1

+0.06 (+0.37%)

USD 7.33B

ETFs Containing SNO:F

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (Real Estate - Development) Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain -4.19% 47% F 21% F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return -4.19% 47% F 21% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain -4.19% 56% F 39% F
Dividend Return 60.73% 71% C- 82% B
Total Return 56.54% 71% C- 80% B-
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain -26.87% 80% B- 24% F
Dividend Return 226.17% 76% C+ 77% C+
Total Return 199.30% 84% B 80% B-
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain -2.77% 65% D 33% F
Dividend Return 17.18% 79% B- 70% C-
Total Return 19.95% 75% C 83% B
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 58.07% 18% F 19% F
Risk Adjusted Return 29.59% 69% C- 52% F
Market Capitalization 8.58B 94% A 84% B

Annual Financials (EUR)

Quarterly Financials (EUR)

Analyst Rating

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Low debt

The company is less leveraged than its peers ,, and is among the top quartile, which makes it more flexible. However, do check the news and look at its sector. Sometimes this is low because the company is not growing and has no growth potential.

High dividend returns

The stock has outperformed its sector peers on average annual dividend returns basis in the past 5 years (for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile. This can be a good buy, especially if it is outperforming on total return basis , for investors seeking high income yields.

High market capitalization

This is one of the largest entities in its sector and is among the top quartile. Such companies tend to be more stable.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Positive free cash flow

The company had positive total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

What to not like:
Poor capital utilization

The company management has delivered below median return on invested capital in the most recent 4 quarters compared to its peers.

Overpriced on cashflow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Overpriced compared to book value

The stock is trading high compared to its peers median on a price to book value basis.

Overpriced compared to earnings

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to earning basis and is above the sector median.

High volatility

The total returns for this company are volatile and above median for its sector over the past 5 years. Make sure you have the risk tolerance for investing in such stock.

Low Revenue Growth

This stock has shown below median revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector