TRTN-PA:NYE-Triton International Limited (USD)

PREFERRED STOCK | Rental & Leasing Services |

Last Closing

USD 25.53

Change

+0.01 (+0.04)%

Market Cap

USD 2.32B

Volume

3.30K

Analyst Target

N/A
Analyst Rating

Verdict

ducovest Verdict

Verdict

About

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2024-12-26 )

Largest Industry Peers for Rental & Leasing Services

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap
AER AerCap Holdings NV

+0.02 (+0.02%)

USD 18.20B
UHAL U-Haul Holding Company

-1.03 (-1.46%)

USD 12.85B
R Ryder System Inc

-0.64 (-0.40%)

USD 6.58B
AL Air Lease Corporation

-0.68 (-1.37%)

USD 5.41B
VSTS Vestis Corporation

-0.34 (-2.17%)

USD 2.15B
PRG PROG Holdings Inc

-0.88 (-2.05%)

USD 1.83B
CTOS Custom Truck One Source Inc

-0.17 (-3.48%)

USD 1.33B
ALTG Alta Equipment Group Inc

-0.27 (-3.85%)

USD 0.27B
GSL-PB Global Ship Lease Inc

-0.24 (-0.91%)

USD 0.09B
MWG Multi Ways Holdings Ltd

-0.02 (-5.16%)

USD 8.27M

ETFs Containing TRTN-PA

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (Rental & Leasing Services) Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain 1.51% 43% F 43% F
Dividend Return 8.45% 88% B+ 89% A-
Total Return 9.96% 43% F 53% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain 1.39% 52% F 44% F
Dividend Return 8.44% 88% B+ 89% A-
Total Return 9.83% 48% F 54% F
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain -6.62% 17% F 42% F
Dividend Return 38.86% 75% C 91% A-
Total Return 32.24% 33% F 57% F
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain 1.35% 38% F 38% F
Dividend Return 9.36% 48% F 57% F
Total Return 8.00% 94% A 94% A
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 12.25% 76% C+ 74% C
Risk Adjusted Return 76.38% 76% C+ 86% B+
Market Capitalization 2.32B 64% D 68% D+

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Superior risk adjusted returns

This stock has performed well, on a risk adjusted basis, compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.

Underpriced on cashflow basis

The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to cash flow basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.

Underpriced compared to earnings

The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to earning basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.

Superior total returns

The stock has outperformed its sector peers on average annual total returns basis in the past 5 years (for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.

Low volatility

The stock’s annual returns have been stable and consistent compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile. Although stability is good, also keep in mind it can limit returns.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

What to not like:
Highly leveraged

The company is in the bottom half compared to its sector peers on debt to equity and is highly leveraged. However, do check the news and look at its sector and management statements. Sometimes this is high because the company is trying to grow aggressively.

Below median dividend returns

The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.

Low Earnings Growth

This stock has shown below median earnings growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector

Low Revenue Growth

This stock has shown below median revenue growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector