BPYPP:NSD-Brookfield Property Partners LP (USD)

PREFERRED STOCK | Real Estate Services |

Last Closing

USD 14.41

Change

0.00 (0.00)%

Market Cap

USD 9.73B

Volume

0.01M

Analyst Target

N/A
Analyst Rating

Verdict

ducovest Verdict

Verdict

About

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2024-12-25 )

Largest Industry Peers for Real Estate Services

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap
CSGP CoStar Group Inc

+0.15 (+0.21%)

USD 30.78B
FSV FirstService Corp

+0.20 (+0.11%)

USD 8.63B
CIGI Colliers International Group I..

-0.19 (-0.14%)

USD 7.35B
NMRK Newmark Group Inc

-0.15 (-1.14%)

USD 3.22B
EXPI eXp World Holdings Inc

+0.14 (+1.18%)

USD 1.97B
OPEN Opendoor Technologies Inc

+0.05 (+3.01%)

USD 1.37B
RDFN Redfin Corp

-0.03 (-0.36%)

USD 1.12B
REAX Real Brokerage Inc

+0.03 (+0.63%)

USD 1.03B
FRPH Frp Holdings Ord

-0.07 (-0.23%)

USD 0.60B
RMR RMR Group Inc

+0.04 (+0.19%)

USD 0.37B

ETFs Containing BPYPP

LARE 0.00 % 0.79 %

N/A

N/A
ZUP-U:CA BMO US Preferred Share In.. 0.00 % 0.00 %

N/A

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (Real Estate Services) Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain 11.53% 77% C+ 67% D+
Dividend Return 9.43% 100% F 93% A
Total Return 20.96% 85% B 73% C
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain 6.74% 77% C+ 61% D-
Dividend Return 9.02% 88% B+ 91% A-
Total Return 15.76% 81% B- 69% C-
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain -44.39% 53% F 29% F
Dividend Return 31.34% 67% D+ 90% A-
Total Return -13.05% 53% F 38% F
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain -6.45% 38% F 25% F
Dividend Return 1.19% 42% F 37% F
Total Return 7.64% 75% C 95% A
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 23.27% 88% B+ 72% C
Risk Adjusted Return 5.12% 46% F 37% F
Market Capitalization 9.73B 96% N/A 92% A

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Superior return on assets

The company management has delivered better return on assets in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Superior capital utilization

The company management has delivered better return on invested capital in the most recent 4 quarters than its peers, placing it in the top quartile.

Superior total returns

The stock has outperformed its sector peers on average annual total returns basis in the past 5 years (for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.

Low volatility

The stock’s annual returns have been stable and consistent compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile. Although stability is good, also keep in mind it can limit returns.

High market capitalization

This is one of the largest entities in its sector and is among the top quartile. Such companies tend to be more stable.

Superior Dividend Growth

This stock has shown top quartile dividend growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector

What to not like:
Poor risk adjusted returns

This company is delivering below median risk adjusted returns in its peers. Even if it is outperforming on returns , the returns are unpredictable. Proceed with caution.

Highly leveraged

The company is in the bottom half compared to its sector peers on debt to equity and is highly leveraged. However, do check the news and look at its sector and management statements. Sometimes this is high because the company is trying to grow aggressively.

Below median dividend returns

The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.

Negative cashflow

The company had negative total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Low Earnings Growth

This stock has shown below median earnings growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector