BATRB:OTCQB-Liberty Media (USD)

COMMON STOCK | Entertainment | OTCQB - U.S. Registered

Last Closing

USD 47

Change

0.00 (0.00)%

Market Cap

N/A

Volume

N/A

Analyst Target

N/A
Analyst Rating

Verdict

ducovest Verdict

Verdict

About

Liberty Braves Group through its subsidiary indirectly owns the Atlanta Braves Major League Baseball club, the Atlanta Braves' stadium and associated real estate projects.

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2024-06-25 )

Largest Industry Peers for Entertainment

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap
UMGNF Universal Music Group N.V.

-0.95 (-3.05%)

USD 56.15B
UNVGY Universal Music Group N.V

-0.28 (-1.85%)

USD 55.09B
BOIVF Bolloré SE

-0.05 (-0.86%)

USD 18.25B
FWONB Formula One Group

N/A

USD 17.80B
VIVEF Vivendi SA

-0.01 (-0.06%)

USD 11.08B
VIVHY Vivendi SA PK

-0.03 (-0.29%)

USD 10.76B
CEVMF CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA

N/A

USD 9.05B
MHSDF Megacable Holdings S. A. B. de..

N/A

USD 4.62B
LLYVB Liberty Media Corporation

N/A

USD 3.46B
MCOIF MultiChoice Group Ltd

N/A

USD 2.63B

ETFs Containing BATRB

N/A

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (Entertainment) Market Performance vs. Exchange (OTCQB - U.S. Registered)
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain 3.30% 64% D 58% F
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 3.30% 64% D 56% F
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain 9.28% 81% B- 67% D+
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 9.28% 81% B- 65% D
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain 77.69% 81% B- 85% B
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return 77.69% 81% B- 83% B
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain 19.67% 46% F 65% D
Dividend Return 19.67% 44% F 62% D
Total Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 35.35% 83% B 64% D
Risk Adjusted Return 55.65% 96% N/A 89% A-
Market Capitalization N/A 90% A- 77% C+

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Superior risk adjusted returns

This stock has performed well, on a risk adjusted basis, compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.

Low volatility

The stock’s annual returns have been stable and consistent compared to its sector peers(for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile. Although stability is good, also keep in mind it can limit returns.

High market capitalization

This is one of the largest entities in its sector and is among the top quartile. Such companies tend to be more stable.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

What to not like:
Highly leveraged

The company is in the bottom half compared to its sector peers on debt to equity and is highly leveraged. However, do check the news and look at its sector and management statements. Sometimes this is high because the company is trying to grow aggressively.

Overpriced on cashflow basis

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to cash flow basis. It is priced above the median for its sectors. Proceed with caution if you are considering to buy.

Overpriced compared to book value

The stock is trading high compared to its peers median on a price to book value basis.

Below median dividend returns

The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.

Negative earnings

The company had negative total earnings in the most recent four quarters.

Negative free cash flow

The company had negative total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Low Earnings Growth

This stock has shown below median earnings growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector