ZIM:NYE-ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (USD)

COMMON STOCK | Marine Shipping |

Last Closing

USD 18.53

Change

0.00 (0.00)%

Market Cap

USD 2.35B

Volume

3.97M

Analyst Target

N/A
Analyst Rating

Verdict

ducovest Verdict

Verdict

About

Unadjusted Closing Price

Adjusted Closing Price

Share Volume

Relative Performance (Total Returns)

Compare
Relative Returns (From:    To: 2024-06-15 )

Largest Industry Peers for Marine Shipping

Symbol Name Price(Change) Market Cap
KEX Kirby Corporation

N/A

USD 6.98B
HAFN Hafnia Limited

N/A

USD 4.27B
MATX Matson Inc

N/A

USD 4.06B
SFL SFL Corporation Ltd

N/A

USD 1.80B
CMRE Costamare Inc

N/A

USD 1.79B
DAC Danaos Corporation

N/A

USD 1.75B
NMM Navios Maritime Partners LP Un..

N/A

USD 1.55B
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.

N/A

USD 0.96B
ASC Ardmore Shpng

N/A

USD 0.93B
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd

N/A

USD 0.87B

ETFs Containing ZIM

ULTY Tidal Trust II 5.67 % 0.00 %

N/A

USD 0.04B
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF 2.20 % 0.00 %

N/A

N/A
VIDI Vident International Equi.. 0.00 % 0.63 %

N/A

USD 0.36B

Market Performance

  Market Performance vs. Industry/Classification (Marine Shipping) Market Performance vs. Exchange
  Value Sector Median Percentile Rank Grade Market Median Percentile Rank Grade
YTD  
Capital Gain 87.74% 100% F 99% N/A
Dividend Return 2.33% 32% F 67% D+
Total Return 90.07% 100% F 99% N/A
Trailing 12 Months  
Capital Gain 42.54% 64% D 93% A
Dividend Return 1.77% 16% F 27% F
Total Return 44.31% 59% D- 93% A
Trailing 5 Years  
Capital Gain N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dividend Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Return N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Average Annual (5 Year Horizon)  
Capital Gain -11.27% 9% A- 7% C-
Dividend Return 6.27% 9% A- 54% F
Total Return 17.54% 89% A- 99% N/A
Risk Return Profile  
Volatility (Standard Deviation) 64.51% 45% F 13% F
Risk Adjusted Return 9.72% 9% A- 35% F
Market Capitalization 2.35B 88% B+ 66% D+

Annual Financials (USD)

Quarterly Financials (USD)

Analyst Rating

Target Price Action Rating Action Analyst Rating Price Date

This is a composite scorecard based on the application of evaluation criteria deemed most important by analysts. This is not a buy or sell recommendation.

What to like:
Low debt

The company is less leveraged than its peers ,, and is among the top quartile, which makes it more flexible. However, do check the news and look at its sector. Sometimes this is low because the company is not growing and has no growth potential.

Underpriced compared to book value

The stock is trading low compared to its peers on a price to book value basis and is in the top quartile. It may be underpriced but do check its financial performance to make sure there is no specific reason.

Superior total returns

The stock has outperformed its sector peers on average annual total returns basis in the past 5 years (for a hold period of at least 12 months) and is in the top quartile.

High market capitalization

This is one of the largest entities in its sector and is among the top quartile. Such companies tend to be more stable.

Positive cash flow

The company had positive total cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

What to not like:
Poor risk adjusted returns

This company is delivering below median risk adjusted returns in its peers. Even if it is outperforming on returns , the returns are unpredictable. Proceed with caution.

Overpriced compared to earnings

The stock is trading high compared to its peers on a price to earning basis and is above the sector median.

Below median dividend returns

The company’s average income yield over the past 5 years has been low compared to its peers. However, it is not a problem if you are not looking for income.

High volatility

The total returns for this company are volatile and above median for its sector over the past 5 years. Make sure you have the risk tolerance for investing in such stock.

Negative free cash flow

The company had negative total free cash flow in the most recent four quarters.

Low Earnings Growth

This stock has shown below median earnings growth in the previous 5 years compared to its sector